Should I adopt in Hongkong -
But the proposal of the Committee that
"Whipping should be allowed for all cases of petty theft and for returning from banishment before time is inadmissible.
The punishment should be imposed for minor offences or for especially heinous and I think that or for repeated offences.
I see the opinions prepared by the Chinese Magistrates.
In 1883, the punishable by whipping was adopted with the exception of the following:
(9) being found armed with dangerous weapons without sufficient reason is considered.
Returning from banishment.
I can move but...
...doubts about piracy.
A common offence in theft and Wounding, I am inclined to think it may properly be made punishable by corporal punishment as was under Act XVII 1868.
If this view is adopted, the Draft Ordinance in 1883 must be disapproved and the foregoing.
I am instructed to introduce.
And authorize the sanction.
Act XXXVII 1881 inflation before entrance and corporal punishment for the offences specified under the letters (W/C) (a) (e) (g) (i) (f) and (h) in the report of the Chinese Magistrates.
And this enactment for all offences after the previous enactments.
As regards prison offences, I would leave it to the Superintendent of the Jail, with the power of inflicting.
Corporal punishment limited to 12 strokes in cases of mutiny without unnecessary concurrence of visiting justice or the Governor.
I express concurrence with the O.A.G. 536 as to the inexpediency.
15th majority of the Committee on the cutting of the queue.
Adopting whipping as a punishment.
Ack for a repeat.
Imprisonment for debt.
Though there seem to be a difference of opinion, it is understood that any be confined in the crowded prison for short sentence prisoners.
I insist on making proper arrangements for preventing an outbreak in the prison, the added scale and diet which should be appended.
EW 20 M-
I agree with Mr. Griffith for his reasons.
Though I have besides a strong feeling that flogging is (objectionable in the case of Asiatics; a more, and a less, humane other aggravated punishment than.
Rfett ha 22 quite.
I also write to Wingfield, I am not prepared to take the responsibility of retracing my steps in face of these Reports.
It has always been abound to agree that in a place like Hongkong, such punishments Story Kerry you may inflict any.
The circumstances are different.
Dealt with a & should 4.
Our Wingfield's solution of Mems to which whipping is to be inflicted seems to me judicious - but I should.
I also to give larger powers of whipping juvenile offenders.
Should I adopts in Brykay-
But the proporch of the Committee that
"Whipping chuulet abword for all cam
r
petty theft and for returning from braistmal Lean to me entering inadmisible.
krinus
The punishment thield migt imponed for
milinu apped ffences or for expecially immer g
and I think that the or for repeated offences
list
see
oppinees prepared of the Chinese Magistrates
J
me tail 1 of 15983 the punishable by chipping
In adopted with the exception of the
hey bet following on
(9) being friend armed with dangerous crapers
"without sufficient reason is mease
uturning from benistonent
I can move but ait
vi a
кака
doubts about piracy.
common offence in thine and Washing I are inclined to think it may propers h made punishable by corporal punishment as war under Ade 171868-
of this wir is adsped the Draft ordinance
in 159813 musth disapproved and the foro.us.
I inshunted to introduce
and
au
Yockriding
Winance
repeating authorize the scan
Ava 371881 inflation befor entrare & arfocal punishment for the offences specific under the letters W/C) (a) (e) (6) (i) (f) anoth) in the repertrassen Chinese Magistales and
this encriting for all offences after tre prevrices avvritenis
the
restore of the as regards prison offences. I would we love Superintendent of the foot, the fewer of inflicting
Corporal panis wment limited to 12 shothes in cover of mating to without unguinity the concurrence of visiting portice org the foreres.
Spons
Is Struld
Cs
El
El
Tech by
Ste
Regulation cobreited the 0.a.g-
I and express concurence with the, O. A. S. 536
as to the inexpedring
15th majority of the Committee
the cutting of the queue
12
adopting
punishment
w
Ack for a repert
A
imprisonment for dell
от стрил
as separed - thuuugh then seam to be per ditter
imprisoned it is undeinratte that any be confined in the crossed pol
Ihats als insist on
2
A
a
✔
chail
temperay movision
it to her fede
prison for shart untence prisoners
Just
I think in my
to make proper exaupments for preventing
an outbreak on the whodneten the adid scale & diet whirl shaved the apperond.
EW 20 M-
Japer with In Griffeld for his reasons.
though I han
besides
a
story fearsal.
feeling that flogging is (urtons in the
Can of Asiaties; a mon, and astra less, humane
other adguratit serve peenishment than
въз
Rfett ha 22
quite
I also
witte der Wingfold, I am aque puponed to take the restimatitit of retracing an
Siemed steps in face of there Reports. It has alway to the abound to aqque that in a plane like
Such preme; hements Story Korry you many inflict any
Kong
el
as
Cs.
my
putin opinion now sancteries in the U.K. The cricumentame, one
Enting different
dilprenty dealt with a
& shound 4.
誓
our Wingheeds velution of Memes to which whithing
is to be inflicted seems to me
pudicions - but I shout
I also to five layer powers of whikking jureinler ottenden
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.